Thursday, November 20, 2008

A Man Wearing Lipstick... or a Pitbull...

It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas! Get excited! Okay, I realize we haven't even celebrated Thanksgiving yet; but seeing as Christmas decorations have been in stores since July, this message could actually be considered a bit tardy. Alright, on to the topic at hand...

When running for political office, it seems that women are often encouraged to "put on masculinity." This could be for a variety of reasons, but it's most likely primarily due to the fact that many people, women included, still feel that females are not suited to command positions of political authority; they believe women are too sentimental to hold office, cannot make political decisions independent of issues in their personal lives, whatever the case may be. For example, during the 2008 Presidential Campaign, Hillary Clinton chose to wear pant suits when she traveled around politiking, resulting in a more masculine image. Ironically, she was criticized for doing so after she was defeated in the primary election; some political theorists say she might have been able to gain more votes--particularly female votes--had she chosen to emphasize her femininity and her political qualifications simultaneously throughout her campaign. However, on the other hand, Sarah Palin chose to appropriate her femininity when constructing her vice-presidential campaign, not only by wearing suit skirts and designer clothes, but highlighting her role as a mother with a family as well. (Interestingly enough, both of these women failed to obtain their desired political positions. What's a girl to do? N.B. I'm trying to keep this blog entry at least somewhat politically neutral.)



On the flip side, men are sometimes encouraged to take on more "female" characteristics in their relationships with women. I realize I'm overgeneralizing here, but many women tend to like men that are sentimental and in touch with their feelings; however, men traditionally are not the "sentimental sex." Ironically, for men to satisfy their "masculine" urges, they often need to appeal to their emotional, "feminine" side in an attempt to please women. My, what a tangled web we weave indeed!

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Parental Units

Greetings! Below I have posted for the benefit of all: "A Tale of Truth!" Or is it all that truthful? I'll leave that to your judgement... ;)

Charlotte's parents seem to possess considerably respectable personalities. Charlotte's mother, Lucy Eldridge, is "everything that is amiable and lovely," and Mr. Temple, though exceptionally benevolent, is "warm," "impetuous," and "unacquainted with the world." "His heart had not been rendered callous by being convinced of [the world's] fraud and hypocrisy." Her parents are reminiscent of those in many of the magazine articles we've read: practically perfect in every way, an 18th century Cleaver couple... or are they? It seems characteristics of each could have, at least indirectly, contributed to Charlotte's "fall." After all, her innocence of mind and impulsive decisions cause her to end up in disastrous circumstances--personality traits that one or both of her parents are said to have! Apparently, the old saying "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree" has some validity.


While Charlotte's parents are a good-natured, good-intentioned couple, certain ways in which they chose to raise their daughter also seem to have played a role in her demise. Charlotte, for the most part, is too trusting of people, as seen with her decision to continually meet Montraville, a man with whom she is only mildly acquainted, under "shady" circumstances. Though she seems to know deep down that she's making the wrong choice, the naive part of her personality never fails to overshadow her apprehensive intuitions. Perhaps if her parents had taught her to be more cautious and suspicious of strangers, she would not have ended up in the predicament she did. (Though this might have proved difficult for her parents, since they seem to possess a pretty rose-colored view of the world themselves.)



Taking Charlotte Temple's tale into consideration, it seems some parents should be a bit more liberal with respect to how they choose to educate their children. For example, some couples raise their sons and daughters with a limited knowledge of sex, leaving their kids to "fend for themselves" and obtain knowledge of this nature on their own. However, if kids are brought up with a more extensive understanding of appropriate/safe sexual conduct, etc., they can make intelligent, informed decisions that will likely lead to better outcomes than those that came of Charlotte's choices. After all, knowledge is power!